They don't dismiss ideas they don't like, but grapple with the underlying problems. The students are interested and engaged, critical but incisive. My survey courses are biased toward that tradition, but any history of philosophy course has to cover Marx, existentialism, post-modernism and feminist philosophy. I was trained in the 'analytic' school, the tradition of Frege and Russell, which prizes logical clarity, precision in argument, and respect of science. I've been teaching philosophy at the university and college level for a decade. For all things Lobster, visit: Other resentful subreddits:.If you really want to ask questions about the finer points of critical theory or epistemology, goto. Serious discussions and learns will probably not happen here, but are not strictly forbidden.If your post history is filled with contributions to subs devoted to sexist or racist nonsense don't be surprised when we show you the door.Petersonians wishing to post stuff are welcome until they are not.No doxxing, brigading, or any of the kind of stuff Peterson uses his Twitter for. There is a difference between eyerolling at Petersonians and actual harassment.This is not a 'change my view' subreddit.

If it has been posted before, don't post it.

Past Announcements: Please keep in mind: Questions and discussions of various sorts are welcome too until they aren't. Links to Twitter shenanigans, interviews, essays, cross-posts from other subs, and some memes are welcome.

This is a sub for posting all Peterson tomfoolery. YouTube - Enhanced for Musicians Use our musician-friendly way to search, save, share, and work with YouTube videos!

Anti Deep Ze 6.62